Even good gene edits can go bad

Rice lab develops procedure to find large deletions, other anomalies in ‘on-target’ CRISPR-Cas9 editing

Rice University researchers are leading an effort to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. From left, Julie Park, Lavanya Saxena, Mingming Cao and Gang Bao. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)

HOUSTON – (Oct. 24, 2022) – A Rice University lab is leading the effort to reveal potential threats to the efficacy and safety of therapies based on CRISPR-Cas9, the Nobel Prize-winning gene editing technique, even when it appears to be working as planned.

Bioengineer Gang Bao of Rice’s George R. Brown School of Engineering and his team point out in a paper published in Science Advances that while off-target edits to DNA have long been a cause for concern, unseen changes that accompany on-target edits also need to be recognized — and quantified.

Researchers Gang Bao and Julie Park prepare to sequence a sample at their Rice University lab. They led a study to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing from unseen changes that accompany on-target edits. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)
Researchers Gang Bao and Julie Park prepare to sequence a sample at their Rice University lab. They led a study to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing from unseen changes that accompany on-target edits. Photo by Jeff Fitlow

Bao noted a 2018 Nature Biotechnology paper indicated the presence of large deletions. “That’s when we started looking into what we can do to quantify them, due to CRISPR-Cas9 systems designed for treating sickle cell disease,” he said.

Bao has been a strong proponent of CRISPR-Cas9 as a tool to treat sickle cell disease, a quest that has brought him and his colleagues ever closer to a cure. Now the researchers fear that large deletions or other undetected changes due to gene editing could persist in stem cells as they divide and differentiate, thus have long-term implications for health.

“We do not have a good understanding of why a few thousand bases of DNA at the Cas9 cut site can go missing and the DNA double-strand breaks can still be rejoined efficiently,” Bao said. “That’s the first question, and we have some hypotheses. The second is, what are the biological consequences? Large deletions (LDs) can reach to nearby genes and disrupt the expression of both the target gene and the nearby genes. It is unclear if LDs could result in the expression of truncated proteins.

“You could also have proteins that misfold, or proteins with an extra domain because of large insertions,” he said. “All kinds of things could happen, and the cells could die or have abnormal functions.”

His lab developed a procedure that uses single-molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing with dual unique molecular identifiers (UMI) to find and quantify unintended LDs along with large insertions and local chromosomal rearrangements that accompany small insertions/deletions (INDELs) at a Cas9 on-target cut site.

“To quantify large gene modifications, we need to perform long-range PCR, but that could induce artifacts during DNA amplification,” Bao said. “So we used UMIs of 18 bases as a kind of barcode.”

“We add them to the DNA molecules we want to amplify to identify specific DNA molecules as a way to reduce or eliminate artifacts due to long-range PCR,” he said. “We also developed a bioinformatics pipeline to analyze SMRT sequencing data and quantified the LDs and large insertions.”

The Bao lab’s tool, called LongAmp-seq (for long-amplicon sequencing), accurately quantifies both small INDELs and large LDs. Unlike SMRT-seq, which requires the use of a long-read sequencer often only available at a core facility, LongAmp-seq can be performed using a short-read sequencer.

Rice University researchers are leading an effort to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. From left, Julie Park, Lavanya Saxena, Mingming Cao and Gang Bao. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)
Rice University researchers are leading an effort to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.From left, Julie Park, Lavanya Saxena, Mingming Cao and Gang Bao. Photo by Jeff Fitlow

To test the strategy, the lab team led by Rice alumna Julie Park, now an assistant research professor of bioengineering, used Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 to edit beta-globin (HBB), gamma-globin (HBG) and B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 11A (BCL11A) enhancers in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) from patients with sickle cell disease, and the PD-1 gene in primary T-cells.

They found large deletions of up to several thousand bases occurred at high frequency in HSPCs: up to 35.4% in HBB, 14.3% in HBG and 15.2% in BCL11A genes, as well as on the PD-1 (15.2%) gene in T-cells.

Since two of the specific CRISPR guide RNAs tested by the Bao lab are being used in clinical trials to treat sickle cell disease, he said it’s important to determine the biological consequences of large gene modifications due to Cas9-induced double-strand breaks.

Bao said the Rice team is currently looking downstream to analyze the consequences of long deletions on messenger RNA, the mediator that carries code for ribosomes to make proteins. “Then we’ll move on to the protein level,” Bao said. “We want to know if these large deletions and insertions persist after the gene-edited HSPCs are transplantation into mice and patients”

Co-authors of the study from Rice are graduate students Mingming Cao and Yilei Fu, alumni Yidan Pan and Timothy Davis, research specialist Lavanya Saxena, microscopist/bioinstrumentation specialist Harshavardhan Deshmukh and Todd Treangen, an assistant professor of computer science, and Emory University’s Vivien Sheehan, an associate professor of pediatrics.

Bao is the department chair and Foyt Family Professor of Bioengineering, a professor of chemistry, materials science and nanoengineering, and mechanical engineering, and a CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research.

The National Institutes of Health (R01HL152314, OT2HL154977) supported the research.

Peer-reviewed research

Comprehensive analysis and accurate quantification of unintended large gene modifications induced by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abo7676

Images for download

Rice University researchers are leading an effort to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. From left, Julie Park, Lavanya Saxena, Mingming Cao and Gang Bao. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)

https://news-network.rice.edu/news/files/2022/10/1024_DNA-1-web.jpg

Rice University researchers are leading an effort to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.From left, Julie Park, Lavanya Saxena, Mingming Cao and Gang Bao. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)

Researchers Gang Bao and Julie Park prepare to sequence a sample at their Rice University lab. They led a study to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing from unseen changes that accompany on-target edits. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)

https://news-network.rice.edu/news/files/2022/10/1024_DNA-2-web.jpg

Researchers Gang Bao and Julie Park prepare to sequence a sample at their Rice University lab. They led a study to reveal potential threats to the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing from unseen changes that accompany on-target edits. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)

Related materials

Rice lab offers new strategies, tools for genome editing: https://news2.rice.edu/2016/02/08/rice-lab-offers-new-strategies-tools-for-genome-editing-2/

New genetic weapons challenge sickle cell disease: https://news2.rice.edu/2019/06/03/new-genetic-weapons-challenge-sickle-cell-disease-2/

Bao Lab: http://bao.rice.edu

Rice Department of Bioengineering: https://bioengineering.rice.edu

George R. Brown School of Engineering: https://engineering.rice.edu

About Rice

Located on a 300-acre forested campus in Houston, Rice University is consistently ranked among the nation’s top 20 universities by U.S. News & World Report. Rice has highly respected schools of Architecture, Business, Continuing Studies, Engineering, Humanities, Music, Natural Sciences and Social Sciences and is home to the Baker Institute for Public Policy. With 4,240 undergraduates and 3,972 graduate students, Rice’s undergraduate student-to-faculty ratio is just under 6-to-1. Its residential college system builds close-knit communities and lifelong friendships, just one reason why Rice is ranked No. 1 for lots of race/class interaction and No. 1 for quality of life by the Princeton Review. Rice is also rated as a best value among private universities by Kiplinger’s Personal Finance.

Body