Partisan politics prolong pandemic

Current News

shots

HOUSTON – (Jan. 13, 2020) – Partisanship has eroded public trust in health agencies and exacerbated the spread of COVID-19, according to Christopher Kulesza, research analyst for the Child Health Policy program, and Quianta Moore, fellow in child health policy at the at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

“Partisan division is still severely inhibiting the United States’ COVID-19 response 10 months after the pandemic began,” the authors wrote on the Baker Institute blog. “As we discussed in our post last July, there were hints that governors and federal authorities recognized the positive impacts of social distancing and mask use. Yet we have witnessed further policy entrenchment from most Democratic and Republican officials. The health consequences of this political divide could not be clearer as the pandemic has grown beyond many experts’ worst predictions.”

Kulesza and Moore argue that political divisions have “transcended traditional policy disagreements” and done significant damage to public trust in government institutions -- including health agencies.

“A significant segment of the American public refuses to accept health advice from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to take the vaccine,” they wrote. “According to Pew Research, approximately 70% of Democratic voters plan on taking the vaccine compared to only 50% of Republicans, which is significantly lower than the 90% required to achieve herd immunity.”

Partisanship is evident in state vaccine distribution as well, the authors argue. Without federal guidance, states have been left to plan distribution on their own -- and many are devising procedures that deviate from CDC recommendations.

“The present division is hindering nearly all meaningful progress on fighting the virus," they wrote. "We need a well-developed plan separated from political motivations to ensure that the vaccines are distributed efficiently and that businesses are not harmed further.”

Credit: 123rf.com/Rice University.
Credit: 123rf.com/Rice University.

With “pandemic fatigue” making lockdowns increasingly unpopular, President-elect Joe Biden is forced to reject the idea of future nationwide business closures, the authors argue.

Outside of lockdowns, the CDC says face masks are the best defense against COVID-19. With Republicans much less likely to wear masks in public and many Republican-controlled state legislatures not mandating them, partisanship is increasing the spread.

“Until the vaccine is ready for improved distribution, policymakers may need to enact legal yet unpopular measures to reduce the current uncontrollable growth of COVID-19 cases,” the authors wrote. “Yet politicians will not be motivated to do so until constituents hold them accountable for their unacceptable behavior.”

Founded in 1993, Rice University’s Baker Institute ranks as the No. 2 university-affiliated think tank in the world and the No. 1 energy think tank in the world. As a premier nonpartisan think tank, the institute conducts research on domestic and foreign policy issues with the goal of bridging the gap between the theory and practice of public policy. The institute’s strong track record of achievement reflects the work of its endowed fellows, Rice University faculty scholars and staff, coupled with its outreach to the Rice student body through fellow-taught classes — including a public policy course — and student leadership and internship programs. Learn more about the institute at www.bakerinstitute.org or on the institute’s blog, http://blog.bakerinstitute.org.

Body