Baker Institute experts: Texas must reduce nonmedical exemptions to vaccinations

David Ruth
713-348-6327
david@rice.edu

Jeff Falk
713-348-6775
jfalk@rice.edu

Baker Institute experts: Texas must reduce nonmedical exemptions to vaccinations

HOUSTON – (Oct. 20, 2016) – As one of the states with the least restrictive vaccine exemption laws in the country, Texas should make the process of obtaining nonmedical exemptions more rigorous to avoid the public health risks and costs associated with preventable diseases, according to a new brief by science policy experts at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.

Credit: shutterstock.com/Rice University

“How Too Much Freedom of Choice Endangers Public Health: The Effect of Nonmedical Exemptions From School-Entry Vaccinations in Texas” was co-authored by Kirstin Matthews, fellow in science and technology policy at the Baker Institute’s Center for Health and Biosciences, and Jackie Olive, an undergraduate intern in the Center for Health and Biosciences.

In Texas, approximately 45,000 nonmedical exemptions were filed across all age groups during the 2015-16 school year, a record high in the last decade and a figure that is only increasing, according to the authors.

“Parents who abstain from getting their children vaccinated often have misguided concerns regarding vaccine safety and utility,” the authors wrote. “Recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable illnesses, including large measles outbreaks in Texas, reflect the decreasing strength of herd immunity and result in billions of dollars in annual medical expenditures as well as indirect costs accounting for work loss and declines in economic productivity.”

To reverse the trend of increasing vaccine exemptions in Texas, the authors argue that public health considerations should be of utmost priority in the discussion of amending current state exemption policies. “The Texas Legislature should employ a multifaceted approach to address school-entry vaccine exemptions,” they wrote and suggested that this should be a priority item in the upcoming state legislative session starting in January.

For example, to increase immunizations among school children, Texas policymakers should either ban conscientious exemptions or make the process of obtaining an exemption stricter by requiring a pediatrician’s signature and mandating that exemption claims be submitted annually, the authors argued.

“Other policies should be implemented to help understand the scope of the problem, including requiring schools and the state health department to publish the number of students on each campus who are vaccinated, under-vaccinated and unvaccinated in a uniform and transparent system,” the authors wrote. “Increased transparency will help eliminate gaps in current vaccination data and inform parents of local vaccination rates, which could potentially impact their decisions on which schools their children will attend.”

Vaccines are one of most cost-effective public health measures, according to the authors. “Therefore, the state should encourage options for individuals who cannot afford vaccines,” they wrote. “One of the best state programs is Texas Vaccines for Children (TVFC). More than 6,500 TVFC providers administer free vaccines to uninsured or underinsured children, children covered by the state Children’s Health Insurance Program and children of Native American or Native Alaskan heritage. Additionally, more than 3.5 million Texas children on Medicaid can be vaccinated for free. The state could also provide incentives to increase provider enrollment in TVFC, particularly in regions with minimal coverage, and publicly acknowledge participating health clinics.”

To interview Matthews, contact Jeff Falk, associate director of national media relations at Rice, at jfalk@rice.edu or 713-348-6775.

-30-

Follow the Baker Institute via Twitter @BakerInstitute and @BakerCHB.

Follow Rice News and Media Relations via Twitter @RiceUNews.

Related materials:

Policy brief: www.bakerinstitute.org/media/files/files/44906b29/BI-Brief-101316-STP_Vaccines.pdf.

Matthews biography: http://bakerinstitute.org/experts/kirstin-rw-matthews.

Founded in 1993, Rice University’s Baker Institute ranks among the top five university-affiliated think tanks in the world. As a premier nonpartisan think tank, the institute conducts research on domestic and foreign policy issues with the goal of bridging the gap between the theory and practice of public policy. The institute’s strong track record of achievement reflects the work of its endowed fellows, Rice University faculty scholars and staff, coupled with its outreach to the Rice student body through fellow-taught classes — including a public policy course — and student leadership and internship programs. Learn more about the institute at www.bakerinstitute.org or on the institute’s blog, http://blogs.chron.com/bakerblog.